[49]
I think, O judges, that it is proved plainly enough, that Oppianicus was prosecuted on such
accusations that it was absolutely impossible for him to be honestly acquitted. Now I will
show you that he was brought before the courts as a criminal, in such a way that he came
before them already condemned, as there had been more than one or even two previous
investigations of his case. For Cluentius, O judges, in the first instance, accused that man
in whose hands he had seized the poison. That was Scamander, the freedman of the Fabricii.
The Bench was honest. There was no suspicion of the
judges having been bribed. A plain case, a well-proved fact, an undeniable charge was brought
before the court. So then this Fabricius, the man whom I have mentioned already seeing that,
if his freedman were condemned, he himself would be in danger, because he knew that I lived in
the neighbourhood of Aletrinum, and was very intimate with many of the citizens of that place,
brought a number of them to me: who, although they had that opinion of the man which they
could not help having, still, because he was of the same municipality as themselves, thought
it concerned their dignity to defend him by what means they could; and they begged of me that
I would do so, and that I would undertake the cause of Scamander; and on his cause all the
safety of his master depended.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.